Compare - Cazena VS Google Cloud Composer
Here’s the difference between Cazena and Google Cloud Composer. The comparison is based on pricing, deployment, business model, and other important factors.
About Cazena
Cazena provides managed cloud service for end-to-end big data service. It acts as an extension to the enterprise infrastructure and enables to run workloads in the cloud. It has intelligence built in to deploy infrastructure for Hadoop, MPP SQL, Spark or search based on the workload. Existing BI tools could be used to analyze the data as if it were present in local. Its use cases include overloaded datacenter, simplifying analytic pipelines, as a sandbox environment, as a data lake etc.
About Google Cloud Composer
Cloud Composer is a fully managed workflow orchestration service, enabling you to create workflows that span across clouds and on-premises data centers. Built on the popular Apache Airflow open source project and operated using the Python programming language, Cloud Composer is free from lock-in and easy to use.
Comparison Table
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Data Lakes | Workflow Orchestration |
| Stage | Mid Stage | Late Stage |
| Target Segment | Enterprise, Mid size | Enterprise, Mid size |
| Deployment | SaaS | SaaSOn Prem |
| Business Model | Commercial | Open Source |
| Pricing | Contact Sales | Freemium |
| Location | US | US |
| Companies using it | ||
| Contact info |
Add to compare
